Quote:
Originally Posted by Arbiter
One year? He'll be out raping and killing in only 365 days? I think that judge is mentally challenged. I personally think that raping a girl under five years old is worth a life sentence, if not death.
|
It's not the judge's fault, it's the fault of the DA. And why would you consider that crime to have the sentence of the death sentence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizabella
He's a convicted sex offender. I haven't looked it up to verify, but aren't there laws in the states that wherever he goes he has to make it known to authorities, and has to inform people when he moves into a neighbourhood? That seems like a large constraint that will be good at protecting the public.
|
The issue first is that the term "sex offender" is used for people who do not necessarily deserve it. For example, in 2009, a girl made a myspace page, deeply in love with her boyfriend. She thought that posting nude pics of herself on there would in some way would get his attention. She was getting charged for child porn. despite it being of herself and being in the database for registered sex offenders (
Girl, 14, faces porn charge of MySpace pictures of herself | Herald Sun).
As for the ranking system that PhoenixAlive posted, he may or may not have to have his information on being a sex offender given to the public at large.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KYLE
Let's just hope that someone murders him before the one year is up.
|
Yay, solve the issue of rapist via murderers, yay! I suppose that along this line of thinking, the murderer does not get convicted or would you still want them convincted anyways?