http://money.cnn.com/2011/01/17/news...ex.htm?iid=RNM
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- There will be fewer cops patrolling the streets of Camden, N.J., come Tuesday.
Struggling to close a $26.5 million budget gap, the city with the second highest crime rate in the nation is laying off 163 police officers. That's nearly 44% of the force.
And Camden will also lose 60 of its 215 firefighters. Some people with desk jobs will be demoted and reassigned to the streets.
The mayor's office says that the cuts will not affect public safety.
"We're still going to protect our residents," said Robert Corrales, spokesman for Mayor Dana Redd. Public safety "will remain our top concern. We'll shift our resources to be more efficient with what we have."
But police and firefighter union officials say the layoffs will most certainly have an impact.
"It's absolutely physically impossible to cover the same amount of ground in the same amount of time with less people," said John Williamson, president of the Fraternal Order of Police union in Camden. "Response times will be slower."
So here's my issue. Camden has one of the highest crime rates in the country, and has had this problem for a long time. While I understand cuts are needed to balance budgets, does this seem even remotely wise or intelligent?