![]() |
12 year olds Statutory Rape Conviction overturned by Ohio Supreme Court
http://www.dispatch.com/live/content...t-a-crime.html
I found this piece of new to be incredibly interesting, heres the jist of what it is. In 2007, two boys, aged 12 and 11, engaged in exploratory sex. The 12 year old was arrested and convicted of multiple counts of deliquent Statutory Rape and was sentenced to be committed to the Ohio Department of Youth Services until his 21st birthday. The sentence was suspended, but he has still been in Sex Offender Therapy for 3 years. Arguments heared in the High Court in February, caused the Justices to question why authorities charged the boy in the first place. The Justices unanimously voted that the Statutory Rape laws were extremely vague and violated the right of Equal Protection of Law. The Justices decided there was no crime, because both children were under 13 and the sex was consensual. |
Re: 12 year olds Statutory Rape Conviction overturned by Ohio Supreme Court
I really do think the entire case should have been thrown out to begin with. It was consensual sex between two people who were roughly the same age. I certainly don't encourage sex at twelve years old, but making it a literal crime is overreaching.
I think the statutory rape laws in general need to be rewritten. I understand that it can create a slippery slope argument either way, but if an eighteen year old has consensual sex with his/her sixteen year old partner, it shouldn't be a crime. |
Re: 12 year olds Statutory Rape Conviction overturned by Ohio Supreme Court
Good. I see no problem with what they did.
|
Re: 12 year olds Statutory Rape Conviction overturned by Ohio Supreme Court
Exploratory sex doesn't mean statutory rape, as far as I know. Was a stupid case to begin with.
|
Re: 12 year olds Statutory Rape Conviction overturned by Ohio Supreme Court
It does sound like the definition of "statutory rape" was stretched beyond breaking point to be honest - given that both parties were minors and the matter should have fallen within so-called "Romeo and Juliet" clauses, I don't understand how this ended up in the court in the first place. Were it not for the fact that it was two boys rather than a boy and a girl, I'm sorry to say I suspect it wouldn't have done, and that raises more pressing questions.
|
Re: 12 year olds Statutory Rape Conviction overturned by Ohio Supreme Court
Quote:
I'm not sure why it was even allowed to go through to trial because the seemed to be no evidence to disregard the younger boy's testimony as well as state the older boy was clearly the offender. It was all loosely implied. The only thing I'm glad about is the issue is being examined before the older boy turned 21. |
Re: 12 year olds Statutory Rape Conviction overturned by Ohio Supreme Court
Quote:
|
Re: 12 year olds Statutory Rape Conviction overturned by Ohio Supreme Court
And here I was thinking the statutory meant between an older person and a minor.
now, if the older boy had been 17 or 19, then I could understand that. But they are about a year apart, which is legal in most places. This sounds like it was totally blown out of the water. He was twelve! I bet he didn't even know what statutory meant. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search engine optimization by vBSEO.
All material copyright ©1998-2025, TeenHelp.
Terms | Legal | Privacy | Conduct | Complaints | Mobile