TeenHelp
Support Forums Today's Posts

Get Advice Connect with TeenHelp Resources
HelpLINK Facebook     Twitter     Tumblr     Instagram    Hotlines    Safety Zone    Alternatives

You are not registered or have not logged in

Hello guest! (Not a guest? Log in above!)

As a guest on TeenHelp you are only able to use some of our site's features. By registering an account you will be able to enjoy unlimited access to our site, and will be able to:

  • Connect with thousands of teenagers worldwide by actively taking part in our Support Forums and Chat Room.
  • Find others with similar interests in our Social Groups.
  • Express yourself through our Blogs, Picture Albums and User Profiles.
  • And much much more!

Signing up is free, anonymous and will only take a few moments, so click here to register now!


Current Events and Debates For discussions and friendly debates about politics and current events, check out this forum.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  (#1 (permalink)) Old
Blackwing Offline
I can't get enough
*********
 
Blackwing's Avatar
 
Name: Zack
Gender: Male
Location: Arizona(Usa)

Posts: 2,830
Blog Entries: 3
Join Date: January 7th 2009

A Nuclear Free World. - April 7th 2009, 01:53 AM

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ont-bet-on-it/
Quote:
President Obama scored wild applause at the Strasbourg town meeting last week when he declared his intention to "seek the goal of a world without nuclear weapons." The idea is not new. In January 2007, the Wall Street Journal published "A World Free of Nuclear Weapons" by senior statesmen George P. Shultz, William J. Perry, Henry A. Kissinger and Sam Nunn, which discussed the increasing dangers posed by nuclear proliferation and the means to counter it under the framework of the 1968 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. The treaty pledges the nuclear powers to work toward "general and complete disarmament," and in exchange, other signatory states pledge not to pursue nuclear-weapons capability. The record of success since 1968 is not impressive. The United States and Russia have radically reduced their nuclear arsenals, from a peak of more than 70,000 warheads during the Cold War to 3,900 today. However, this drawdown was not accomplished through formal arms control; it was the natural consequence of reduced tensions after the collapse of communism. More to the point, since the nonproliferation treaty was concluded, India, Pakistan and North Korea have tested nuclear weapons, and Israel is widely believed to possess them. The president quixotically says that a further U.S.-Russian nuclear drawdown will give the United States "greater moral authority to say to Iran, 'Don't develop a nuclear weapon,' to say to North Korea, 'Don't proliferate nuclear weapons.' " This is a charming notion, but it displays shocking ignorance of the strategic rationale driving countries toward creating or expanding their nuclear arsenals. In general, the smaller and less powerful the country, the more beneficial nuclear weapons are. North Korea, the poster child for rogue countries with nuclear weapons, is a failed totalitarian state that has rendered itself immune from attack for fear of the consequences. Iran is seeking a nuclear capability both as an insurance card against regime change and to enable a more aggressive foreign policy at lower ends of the conflict spectrum, through proxies such as Hezbollah and Hamas as well as through its own conventional force. In response to the growing threat from Tehran, the major Arab states have decided to pursue ostensibly peaceful nuclear programs that could lead to weapons development. And Israel cannot afford to let its weapons go because the risk is too great; Tel Aviv is in a rough neighborhood and can't afford to lose even one war. The main beneficiary of the nuclear-free world would be the United States. As the supreme conventional military power, America would enjoy extraordinary strategic advantages in the post-nuclear environment. Our cities would be safe from annihilation. Conventional forces would be free to operate globally without the risk of nuclear attack. Command of the air and sea would be unquestioned. The United States would enjoy unchallenged escalation dominance and would be able to intervene in a greater number of regions with more force, without fear that an unforeseen series of events could lead to uncontrolled nuclear conflagration. For these reasons, we would like to see Mr. Obama succeed in his quest for a nuclear-weapons-free world. However, in the contest between his presumed moral authority and the reality of global power politics, we reluctantly are compelled to bet our money on the latter.


  Send a message via AIM to Blackwing  
  (#2 (permalink)) Old
TigerTank77 Offline
Rage is the best anesthetic
I've been here a while
********
 
TigerTank77's Avatar
 
Name: Ben
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Location: NY

Posts: 1,534
Join Date: January 5th 2009

Re: A Nuclear Free World. - April 7th 2009, 02:46 AM

Honestly, it's a lovely thought but it will never happen. Simply because the technology exists to make more, and a lot of countries that would use it offensively are attempting to develop them.

Plus, nuclear weapons have always been a very lovely Third World War Deterrence.


Often I lie wide awake, thinking of things I could make.
But I donít seem to have the parts to build them.
I am so scared of what will kill me in the end, for I am not prepared.
I hope I will get the chance to be someone, to be human.





  Send a message via AIM to TigerTank77 Send a message via MSN to TigerTank77 Send a message via Skype™ to TigerTank77 
  (#3 (permalink)) Old
Hyper Sonic Offline
Banned
I can't get enough
*********
 
Hyper Sonic's Avatar
 
Gender: Male
Location: England

Posts: 2,374
Blog Entries: 23
Join Date: January 5th 2009

Re: A Nuclear Free World. - April 7th 2009, 02:47 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerTank77 View Post
Honestly, it's a lovely thought but it will never happen. Simply because the technology exists to make more, and a lot of countries that would use it offensively are attempting to develop them.

Plus, nuclear weapons have always been a very lovely Third World War Deterrence.
Exactly. It won't happen for countries need them as a deterrent. Particularly a country which does not have good foreign relations
   
  (#4 (permalink)) Old
Blackwing Offline
I can't get enough
*********
 
Blackwing's Avatar
 
Name: Zack
Gender: Male
Location: Arizona(Usa)

Posts: 2,830
Blog Entries: 3
Join Date: January 7th 2009

Re: A Nuclear Free World. - April 7th 2009, 03:28 AM

Obama has a nice dream but it won't happen.


  Send a message via AIM to Blackwing  
  (#5 (permalink)) Old
Hyper Sonic Offline
Banned
I can't get enough
*********
 
Hyper Sonic's Avatar
 
Gender: Male
Location: England

Posts: 2,374
Blog Entries: 23
Join Date: January 5th 2009

Re: A Nuclear Free World. - April 7th 2009, 03:29 AM

Just like every other politician really
   
  (#6 (permalink)) Old
Blackwing Offline
I can't get enough
*********
 
Blackwing's Avatar
 
Name: Zack
Gender: Male
Location: Arizona(Usa)

Posts: 2,830
Blog Entries: 3
Join Date: January 7th 2009

Re: A Nuclear Free World. - April 7th 2009, 06:15 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyper Sonic View Post
Just like every other politician really
Except a few that are in favor of Nuclear weapons.


  Send a message via AIM to Blackwing  
  (#7 (permalink)) Old
Heretic Offline
The Architect
I've been here a while
********
 
Heretic's Avatar
 
Name: [060191.1723]
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Location: 43.337557, -89.638498

Posts: 1,695
Blog Entries: 9
Join Date: January 6th 2009

Re: A Nuclear Free World. - April 7th 2009, 12:14 PM

Well, what do you expect? It would be very nice to get rid of all those nuclear weapons, but I don't see it happening any time soon. Countries, especially totalitarian and dictatorship states (and similar states) will continue working to enrich uranium for their own means.


Ethos
Pathos
Logos

050516.0029
  Send a message via MSN to Heretic  
  (#8 (permalink)) Old
Hyper Sonic Offline
Banned
I can't get enough
*********
 
Hyper Sonic's Avatar
 
Gender: Male
Location: England

Posts: 2,374
Blog Entries: 23
Join Date: January 5th 2009

Re: A Nuclear Free World. - April 7th 2009, 04:35 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by EDGE View Post
Except a few that are in favor of Nuclear weapons.
In this case I was referring to having a nice dream but it never happening rather than just nukes.

To expand on Arbiter's point if these countries had nukes then the USA, Britain and Israel would need nukes as a deterrent or at least payback should one of these states not care
   
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
free, nuclear, world

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All material copyright ©1998-2019, TeenHelp.
Terms | Legal | Privacy | Conduct | Complaints

Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000-2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search engine optimization by vBSEO.
Theme developed in association with vBStyles.