Support Forums Today's Posts

Get Advice Connect with TeenHelp Resources
HelpLINK Facebook     Twitter     Tumblr     Instagram    Hotlines    Safety Zone    Alternatives

You are not registered or have not logged in

Hello guest! (Not a guest? Log in above!)

As a guest on TeenHelp you are only able to use some of our site's features. By registering an account you will be able to enjoy unlimited access to our site, and will be able to:

  • Connect with thousands of teenagers worldwide by actively taking part in our Support Forums and Chat Room.
  • Find others with similar interests in our Social Groups.
  • Express yourself through our Blogs, Picture Albums and User Profiles.
  • And much much more!

Signing up is free, anonymous and will only take a few moments, so click here to register now!

Current Events and Debates For discussions and friendly debates about politics and current events, check out this forum.

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  (#1 (permalink)) Old
RadioSerenade Offline
Regular TeenHelper
RadioSerenade's Avatar
Name: The Limelighter
Age: 24
Gender: Male
Location: Sydney.

Posts: 407
Blog Entries: 30
Join Date: September 8th 2014

Rant on Crime. - April 10th 2016, 10:50 AM

I have been meaning to write this thread for a week or so now but I have had these thoughts with me for some time and it was only after the response to an incident that occurred that blurred the lines of victim and offendor that I have decided to speak out.

I really do not like criminal law.

I do not mind the law, laws are wonderful pieces of language and demonstrations of the power of the written word, and also a ratification of the fundamental rights we have as human beings. You cannot theoretically ignore words that are right in front of you, and this is the sort of thing that evidence relies on when people are challenging certain convictions and such things.

But I do not like criminal law.

All of this reached a head for me when someone named Benjamin Batterham was charged with murder after allegedly killing a burglar who attempted to rob his house, and in fact succeeded, with a handbag belonging to Mr. Batterham's wife on his person when an altercation took place in the hallway. This should be no trouble, a judge should sit down with the pieces of legislation involved in the matter at his person and goes forth in a nuanced and extremely detailed discussion of definitions and societal considerations before handing down some decisions, and we may be one step closer to defining self-Defense, or debating the very premise of its existance.

But, no instead we write petitions with headings such as, RELEASE Benjamin Batterham from custody WITH NO CHARGES NOW!

I think criminal law has been hijacked by people who have no qualification to comment on it. This is because crime is something so personal and it is something that everyone has a vested interest in the treatment of. However, the comment on legal proceedings without qualification leads to a loss of my hair. Firstly, it is not a suspect, it is a person of interest. It is not a confession, this is not the Catholic Church, it is called an admission. It is not an interrogation, it is an interview. It is not "innocent", it is "not guilty".

No way known that any judge worth his or her salt would consider making judgement on the purity of an offender's soul.

Let the people who know what the fuck they are doing do what the fuck they do. It is as simple as that. Can you imagine if people commented on science without qualification. Oh, actually, that is already true, with people using studies on unpaid work to go into pub room hilarities as to which gender does the most housework.

Because crime is something that everyone has a vested interest in, it is something that governments masturbate over. A government can get away with pretty much anything in the name of being tough on crime or having tough borders and national security measured in place. These include the ability for police to hold offenders without charge and the expenditure of billions upon billions on killing machines, but that is a matter for another, much shorter thread. This is especially true in Australia, because the worst government in Australian history has only one thing on its side: National Security. The Opposition Party in Australia disagrees with everything the government does, except in the case of National Security, where it agrees with everything the government does.

All pens drops for war or unattended bags.

People say that many of the measures and definitions surrounding self Defense and the treatment of crime are there for the welfare of criminals. Is that not a good thing? In the United States, where people could not give a flying fuck about the welfare of criminals, people get charged 4.5 years for drug possession, to be served in commercially owned facilities. People have no idea what they are getting themselves in for.

I can only recommend that people leave criminal law in the hands of people who do know, it is now a basket case to me.

02425950695064738395657479136519351798334535362521 43003540126026771622672160419810652263169355188780 38814483140652526168785095552646051071172000997092 91249544378887496062882911725063001303622934916080 25459461494578871427832350829242102091825896753560 43086993801689249889268099510169055919951195027887 17830837018340236474548882222161573228010132974509 27344594504343300901096928025352751833289884461508 94042482650181938515625357963996189939679054966380 03222348723967018485186439059104575627262464195387
Closed Thread


crime, rant

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All material copyright 1998-2018, TeenHelp.
Terms | Legal | Privacy | Conduct | Complaints

Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000-2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search engine optimization by vBSEO.
Theme developed in association with vBStyles.