Hello guest! (Not a guest? Log in above!) As a guest you can submit help requests, create and reply to Forum posts, join our Chat Room and read our range of articles & resources. By registering you will be able to get fully involved in our community and enjoy features such as connect with members worldwide, add friends & send messages, express yourself through a Blog, find others with similar interests in Social Groups, post pictures and links, set up a profile and more! Signing up is free, anonymous and will only take a few moments, so click here to register now!
Current Events and Debates For discussions and friendly debates about politics and current events, check out this forum.
Jury begins deliberations on Lindsay Clancy case -
Yesterday, 12:24 AM
Lindsay Clancy killed 3 of her children. She is arguing that as a result of postpartum psychosis, she was not sane at the time of the killings and therefore not guilty of murder. Both sides have rested and the jury is deliberating. Thoughts?
Re: Jury begins deliberations on Lindsay Clancy case -
Yesterday, 06:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dude111
She might just be trying to get out of murder!!!
Its very sad...
Or she was legally insane and this isnt murder at all. Reninds me of Andrea Yates' case, except there were stronger indicators of insanity in that case(her husband believed in a strange religious practice of having as many children as nature allowed regardless of impact on the mother and her mental health struggles were present but relatively de-prioritized before the killings).You can be mentally ill though and still be found guilty. True insanity requires not being in the state of mind to evaluate actions ethically,legally, or logically. It is rare, but it definitely happens that a person is determined to have been too mentally ill to evaluate their actions. If this is true insanity, she doesnt belong in prison.