Quote:
Originally Posted by JamieRage
how is it any MORE legitamate because jesus exists in more than one so called holy writing??
scientists have more than one theory of evolution. if that's how you justify your beliefs then surely mine must be stronger than yours due to some proof of evolution. there is NO proof of religion. it's all faith, if people didn't have faith there would be NO religion. now im sure that being said it doesn't help my arguement but i don't care. what im trying to say anyone could have written the bible. and anybody else could have made up their own "holy" vartiations. which is one possibility.
i don't believe in such this as "holy" unless its my socks or swiss cheese. (im just sayn)
|
1) I never said Jesus being in more than one text makes anything more legitimate, you said something about jesus not existing (or no proof), and I posted other wise. I even said in my post that he probably wasn't a holy man, just a man that existed. Even some atheists acknowledge Jesus' existence
2) Easy there Darwin, I'm not even christian (or any religion I could put a name to, if you care to know). So before you try and be all high and mighty.
You responded with shit that had nothing to do what I said, all i responded to your post was saying.
- There is actual evidence that could point towards a "Jesus" existing.
- Any religious text wouldn't be any less credible if it was written by a mentally unstable person.
Good try though (Y)
Also, you are correct anyone could start a religion, Scientology is a great example.