Hello guest! (Not a guest? Log in above!) As a guest you can submit help requests, create and reply to Forum posts, join our Chat Room and read our range of articles & resources. By registering you will be able to get fully involved in our community and enjoy features such as connect with members worldwide, add friends & send messages, express yourself through a Blog, find others with similar interests in Social Groups, post pictures and links, set up a profile and more! Signing up is free, anonymous and will only take a few moments, so click here to register now!
LGBTQ+, Sexuality and Gender Identity This forum is for you to explore your sexuality and identity, whatever that may be.
So, I got bored in study hall the other day and decided to read my history textbook. I read all the way from the 1920s to the present, and one thing that I noticed was that every social group seemed to have a Rights Movement, from the Protestants, to the African Americans, to the Asian Americans, the Mexican Immigrants, the Native Americans. Another thing that I noticed was that there was absolutely no mention of the LGBT community at all. Not the Gay Rights Movement, not even a footnote about their persecution in Nazi Germany. I just wanted to know peoples opinions on this subject, why you think this is and how you feel about it. Thanks! Enjoy Yourselves!
Sometimes people build up walls not to keep others out, but to see who cares enough to break them down...
I think tha most textbooks don't include LGBT thins because it is such a large topic of discussion and a lot of people fight about it.
Granted, people also have opinions on the other things listed though it's not as large of an agrument.
In my Geography text book, it featured a gay man going to Mardi Gras and everyone in my class was mature about it.
I guess they don't want to offend any LGBT people or cause argument.
History is written by the Victors, the LGBT community hasn't really won much...compared to say, African-Americans. But, it also depends when the text book was written, and when the source information was compiled. And yet then, for something so subjective as sexuality and gender freedom, there wouldn't be a class that would actually study it - and it risks offending people. That's what I think anyway.
It would be amazing to have LGBT history in textbooks, but at the moment there is nothing. Maybe in a more accepting world? I know if there was a history class about the LGBT movement my (now ex) class would have made jokes that they thought were "hilarious" that were rather ignorant and bigoted.
I've said it once, I've said it twice, I've said it a thousand fucking times
That I'm OK, that I'm fine, that it's all just in my mind
But this has got the best of me, and I can't seem to sleep
It's not 'cause you're not with me, it's cause you never leave
Some history textbooks do vaguely mention homosexuals in Nazi Germany.
I believe that within the next 10-20 years, LGBTQ rights and issues will be at least a small addition to textbooks. History textbooks tend to focus mainly on racial issues and those based upon gender.. But seeing that the LGBTQ rights movement is really picking up, I think it will eventually have its place.
"Although only breath, words which I command are immortal." Sappho
"Sometimes I feel nothing at all. Sometimes I feel everything is my fault.
Sometimes I feel the hate break my mind. Sometimes I feel they deserve it this time.
May the bridges I burn light my way." - I, Alone - Otep
I think a lot of it is that the matter is so contested. Things like religious and racial acceptance is no biggie. But things like whether woman are accepted fully or not or whether the LGBT is fully integrated etc. It depends where you live, and it's really hard to teach. Womans rights tend to be talked about first. For example, I have taken classes where they make it sound like everything is A-Ok, woman have total equality, and others make it sound like the total equality is a facade, and ooooh, we are actually seriously oppressed. I think it is a combo, I am defs not "oppressed" but I know there is still a lot o backwards/old fashioned thinking out there screwing woman over too... And it is even more so with the lgbt... I think a lot of what happened there was that it wasn't put right into the laws right away, like woman's rights and racial/religious rights were codified into law no problem, but the lgbt rights have been a bit slower to uptake and tend to rely on other laws such as the general "freed of this that and the other" typed things applying to it
No matter how you personally feel about gay rights and freedom to be gay, we all have to agree that the gay rights movement is historically signifigant.
Oh, I am not denying that... And I think it largely depends on what school you go to and what text books the school board/profs want... I had a prof who talked A LOT about it.... But some don't.... I think part of it is WHO is telling about it, like I have had a lot of male profs who have difficulty talking about woman's rights.... So yeah
A teacher in a movie I once saw said "If you're not in the history book you don't exist." And I think there's some truth to that. Many people that have influenced history were queer, but their achievements are often erased. Same goes for members of other minority groups that have made an impact. It's ridiculous. Until schools wise up and start placing greater emphasis on the history of people other than heterosexual white men, we'll have to carry it on ourselves. f we don't seek to learn about history outside of the standard history books, then it's like these people never existed at all.